<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rails &amp; Ties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmfemme.com/2007/10/25/rails-ties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmfemme.com/2007/10/25/rails-ties/</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:34:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FilmFemme &#187; Double Patricia Clarkson Feature</title>
		<link>http://filmfemme.com/2007/10/25/rails-ties/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>FilmFemme &#187; Double Patricia Clarkson Feature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmfemme.com/2007/10/25/rails-ties/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>[...] and I loved it.  The train motif doesn&#8217;t even feel overpowering or stupid (unlike at least one recent train-based movie).  The direction isn&#8217;t anything special, but it is seamless and not distracting.  This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and I loved it.  The train motif doesn&#8217;t even feel overpowering or stupid (unlike at least one recent train-based movie).  The direction isn&#8217;t anything special, but it is seamless and not distracting.  This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
